T.: Not quite, L.G. At least. While that might suffice for those who believe in the Bible and what it says about you, L.G.
There are many who do not believe either in the Bible or in you. And, for them, the idea or theory of living and then dying and assuming 'eternal or forever life', just would not wash. It is too incredible.
L.G.: So, T. Let us assume or work on the premise that even I, whom you refer to, for the purpose of this conversation, as 'Lord God.' Let us assume that I do not have all the answers either.
Where then, do we go with this conversation, this analysis?
T.: Well, L.G. Probably having 'everlasting or forever life' is not really the issue. Probably that is not what us humans should become preoccupied with.
LG.: How comes so, T! Please elaborate.
T.: You see, L.G. For humans to have 'everlasting or forever life', is or should be sort of the means to an end or objective.
And not an end in itself. The question it raises is that of, why should humans have or want to live forever? What would they do with it?
L.G.: Quite, T. After all; it might well be the case that, having the ability to live forever, as it were, is or would not be all that it is cut out to be.
Take me, for example. What do humans make of me, regarding their presumption that I am an entity that lives forever?
T.: What do you mean, L.G.?
To be continued!
No comments:
Post a Comment